Core i5-4670S vs FX-8150

Core i5-4670S vs FX-8150 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4670S

4 / 4

5,252

0.0%

5,318

+1.3%

Athlon Silver 3050U

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670S vs FX-8150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670S vs FX-8150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670S

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $32 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
✅Delivers 13.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.7 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while FX-8150 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8150 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,252 vs 5,318).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-8150

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($245 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8150 better than Core i5-4670S?

Yes. FX-8150 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 18.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8150 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8150 is still the much better call for a fresh build. FX-8150 comes in 15.0% more expensive on MSRP at $245 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4670S only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 13.6% better value on paper (24.7 vs 21.7 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4670S makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4670S vs FX-8150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670S

The Core i5-4670S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,252 points. Launch price was $149.

FX-8150

The FX-8150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,318 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4670S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8150 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8150 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670S versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-8150 — a 10% clock advantage for the FX-8150 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-4670S uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-8150 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670S scores 5,252 against the FX-8150's 5,318 — a 1.2% lead for the FX-8150. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670S vs 8192 kB on the FX-8150.

Feature	Core i5-4670S	FX-8150
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4.2 GHz+11%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	8192 kB+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	8192 kB+3100%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	5,252	5,318+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670S uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8150 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4670S	FX-8150
Socket	LGA1150	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670S) / not specified (FX-8150). The Core i5-4670S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-8150 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670S targets Desktop Low Power.

Feature	Core i5-4670S	FX-8150
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop Low Power	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4670S was priced at $213, while the FX-8150 came in at $245. On launch pricing ($213 vs $245), Core i5-4670S was $32 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670S delivers 24.7 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the FX-8150 — making the Core i5-4670S the 12.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4670S	FX-8150
MSRP	$213-13%	$245
Performance per Dollar	24.7+14%	21.7
Release Date	2013	2011

Search Core i5-4670S on Amazon

Search FX-8150 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.