Xeon E5-1620
VS
Core i5-7600T

Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i5-7600T

Intel

Xeon E5-1620

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-7600T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1620 is positioned at rank 953 and the Core i5-7600T is on rank 591, so the Core i5-7600T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1620

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
31441%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
5936%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5274%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4074%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
97%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
95%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
93%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
92%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
91%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
91%
#953
Xeon E5-1620
MSRP: $885|Avg: $70
100%
#955
Xeon E5462
MSRP: $342|Avg: $45
98%
#958
Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48
96%
#959
Xeon E5-1620 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
95%
#963
Xeon E5-2660
MSRP: $1329|Avg: $65
92%
#964
Xeon E5-2667 v3
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
92%
#966
Xeon E3110
MSRP: $214|Avg: $158
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7600T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10271%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9705%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7046%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2123%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1681%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1471%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
843%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
831%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
757%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
757%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
749%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
728%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
718%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
715%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
709%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
100%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
100%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
99%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
99%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
99%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
98%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
98%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
97%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
97%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
97%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
97%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-7600T (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-1620Core i5-7600T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
More affordable ($60)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-1620 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-1620Core i5-7600T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+16%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1620 and Core i5-7600T

Intel

Xeon E5-1620

The Xeon E5-1620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,848 points. Launch price was $313.

Intel

Core i5-7600T

The Core i5-7600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,827 points. Launch price was $224.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1620 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-7600T's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-7600T — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1620 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-1620 uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-7600T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1620 scores 5,848 against the Core i5-7600T's 5,827 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-1620. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 612 vs 1,243, a 68% lead for the Core i5-7600T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7600T.

FeatureXeon E5-1620Core i5-7600T
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+3%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+29%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
10240 kB (total)+67%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
5,848
5,827
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,469
Geekbench 6 Single
612
1,243+103%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1620 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-7600T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-1620 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7600T — the Core i5-7600T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-1620 supports up to 375 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 141.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-1620) vs 2 (Core i5-7600T). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-1620) vs 16 (Core i5-7600T) — the Xeon E5-1620 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel C600,Intel X79 (Xeon E5-1620) and B250,H270,Z270 (Core i5-7600T).

FeatureXeon E5-1620Core i5-7600T
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
375 GB+486%
64 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40+150%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Xeon E5-1620) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7600T). The Core i5-7600T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-1620 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7600T rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.

FeatureXeon E5-1620Core i5-7600T
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-1620 launched at $885 MSRP, while the Core i5-7600T debuted at $192. At current prices ($70 vs $60), the Core i5-7600T is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1620 delivers 83.5 pts/$ vs 97.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-7600T — making the Core i5-7600T the 15% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-1620Core i5-7600T
MSRP
$885
$192-78%
Avg Price (30d)
$70
$60-14%
Performance per Dollar
83.5
97.1+16%
Release Date
2012
2017