Xeon E5-1620
VS
Opteron 6378

Xeon E5-1620 vs Opteron 6378

Intel

Xeon E5-1620

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Opteron 6378

16 Cores16 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1620 is positioned at rank 953 and the Opteron 6378 is on rank 57, so the Opteron 6378 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1620

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
31441%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
5936%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5274%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4074%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
97%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
95%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
93%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
92%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
91%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
91%
#953
Xeon E5-1620
MSRP: $885|Avg: $70
100%
#955
Xeon E5462
MSRP: $342|Avg: $45
98%
#958
Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48
96%
#959
Xeon E5-1620 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
95%
#963
Xeon E5-2660
MSRP: $1329|Avg: $65
92%
#964
Xeon E5-2667 v3
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
92%
#966
Xeon E3110
MSRP: $214|Avg: $158
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6378

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
1412%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
267%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
237%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
183%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
99%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
85%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
82%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
82%
#57
Opteron 6378
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#60
Opteron 6274
MSRP: $639|Avg: $80
96%
#61
Opteron 6238
MSRP: $455|Avg: $118
96%
#63
Opteron 6376
MSRP: $703|Avg: N/A
95%
#64
Opteron 6328
MSRP: $575|Avg: $42
90%
#65
Opteron 6272
MSRP: $523|Avg: $50
89%
#71
Opteron 6220
MSRP: $523|Avg: $239
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($70) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-1620 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-1620Opteron 6378
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Abu Dhabi (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 6378 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($70 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-1620Opteron 6378
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1620 and Opteron 6378

Intel

Xeon E5-1620

The Xeon E5-1620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,848 points. Launch price was $313.

AMD

Opteron 6378

The Opteron 6378 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,889 points. Launch price was $396.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1620 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6378 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6378 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 versus 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6378 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1620 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-1620 uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Opteron 6378 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1620 scores 5,848 against the Opteron 6378's 5,889 — a 0.7% lead for the Opteron 6378. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6378.

FeatureXeon E5-1620Opteron 6378
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+15%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+50%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
10240 kB (total)+25%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
16 MB+6300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark
5,848
5,889
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,469
Geekbench 6 Single
612
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1620 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 6378 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-1620Opteron 6378
Socket
LGA2011
G34
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
375 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Xeon E5-1620) / not specified (Opteron 6378).

FeatureXeon E5-1620Opteron 6378
Integrated GPU
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true