Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1630 v3

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,421 vs 7,460).
❌Launch MSRP is still $372 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2637 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2637 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 135W instead of 140W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2637 v4 better than Xeon E5-1630 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-1630 v3 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2637 v4 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2637 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2637 v4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-1630 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2637 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $372 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1630 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-1630 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2637 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-1630 v3

The Xeon E5-1630 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 7,421 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2637 v4

The Xeon E5-2637 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,460 points. Launch price was $996.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon E5-2637 v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1630 v3 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v4 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1630 v3 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E5-1630 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1630 v3 scores 7,421 against the Xeon E5-2637 v4's 7,460 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2637 v4. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-2637 v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-1630 v3	Xeon E5-2637 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+3%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+6%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)	10 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	7,421	7,460