Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2667
Xeon E5-1630 v3
Xeon E5-2667
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1630 v3 is positioned at rank 402 and the Xeon E5-2667 is on rank 991, so the Xeon E5-1630 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1630 v3
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2667
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-1630 v3 | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($299) | ✅ More affordable ($31) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-1630 v3 | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+867%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($299) | ✅ More affordable ($31) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon E5-2667
Xeon E5-1630 v3
The Xeon E5-1630 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 7,421 points. Launch price was $800.
Xeon E5-2667
The Xeon E5-2667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,442 points. Launch price was $714.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-1630 v3 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1630 v3 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1630 v3 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon E5-1630 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1630 v3 scores 7,421 against the Xeon E5-2667's 7,442 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2667. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1630 v3 | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+9% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+28% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total) | 15360 kB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 7,421 | 7,442 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1630 v3 | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3 1600 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 384 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-1630 v3) / true (Xeon E5-2667). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2667 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1630 v3 | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-1630 v3 launched at $372 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2667 debuted at $1552. At current prices ($299 vs $31), the Xeon E5-2667 is $268 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1630 v3 delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 240.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2667 — making the Xeon E5-2667 the 162.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1630 v3 | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $372-76% | $1552 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $31-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.8 | 240.1+868% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon E5-2667
