
Xeon E5-1630 v3

Xeon E5-2667
Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2667 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2667 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2667: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E5-1630 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,180 less on MSRP ($372 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 316.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 4.8 PassMark/$ ($372 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,421 vs 7,442).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 15 MB).
Xeon E5-2667
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 10 MB).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 140W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1630 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $372 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-1630 v3 better than Xeon E5-2667?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2667 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-1630 v3
The Xeon E5-1630 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 7,421 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2667
The Xeon E5-2667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,442 points. Launch price was $714.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-1630 v3 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1630 v3 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1630 v3 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon E5-1630 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1630 v3 scores 7,421 against the Xeon E5-2667's 7,442 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2667. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1630 v3 | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+9% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+28% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total) | 15360 kB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 7,421 | 7,442 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1630 v3 | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3 1600 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 384 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-1630 v3) / true (Xeon E5-2667). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2667 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1630 v3 | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E5-1630 v3 was priced at $372, while the Xeon E5-2667 came in at $1552. On launch pricing ($372 vs $1552), Xeon E5-1630 v3 was $1180 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1630 v3 delivers 19.9 pts/$ vs 4.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2667 — making the Xeon E5-1630 v3 the 122.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1630 v3 | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $372-76% | $1552 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.9+315% | 4.8 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














