Xeon E5-1630 v3
VS
Xeon E5-2650

Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2650

Intel

Xeon E5-1630 v3

4 Cores8 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2650

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1630 v3 is positioned at rank 402 and the Xeon E5-2650 is on rank 406, so the Xeon E5-1630 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1630 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5600%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1057%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
939%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
726%
#270
Xeon E-2176G
MSRP: $367|Avg: $405
100%
#271
EPYC 7401
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $450
99%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
97%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
96%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
96%
#402
Xeon E5-1630 v3
MSRP: $372|Avg: $299
100%
#416
Xeon E3-1276 v3
MSRP: $213|Avg: $244
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5655%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1068%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
949%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
733%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
98%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
97%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
97%
#278
Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP: $1445|Avg: N/A
95%
#406
Xeon E5-2650
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#416
Xeon E3-1276 v3
MSRP: $213|Avg: $244
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Xeon E5-2650 leads in gaming performance. However, the Xeon E5-1630 v3 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightXeon E5-1630 v3Xeon E5-2650
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($299)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightXeon E5-1630 v3Xeon E5-2650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($299)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon E5-2650

Intel

Xeon E5-1630 v3

The Xeon E5-1630 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 7,421 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon E5-2650

The Xeon E5-2650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,349 points. Launch price was $91.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1630 v3 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1630 v3 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1630 v3 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon E5-1630 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1630 v3 scores 7,421 against the Xeon E5-2650's 7,349 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-1630 v3. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650.

FeatureXeon E5-1630 v3Xeon E5-2650
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+36%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+85%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)
20480 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
7,421
7,349
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 4.0.

FeatureXeon E5-1630 v3Xeon E5-2650
Socket
LGA2011
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
384 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-1630 v3) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650 targets Server.

FeatureXeon E5-1630 v3Xeon E5-2650
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server