Xeon E5-1650 vs Xeon X7560

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1650 vs Xeon X7560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1650 vs Xeon X7560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1650

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X7560 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,056 vs 8,110).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).

Xeon X7560

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X7560 better than Xeon E5-1650?

Yes. Xeon X7560 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X7560 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X7560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X7560 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X7560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-1650 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-1650 vs Xeon X7560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-1650

The Xeon E5-1650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,056 points. Launch price was $175.

Xeon X7560

The Xeon X7560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.27 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 8,110 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1650 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon X7560 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon X7560 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1650 versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon X7560 — a 34.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1650 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.27 GHz). The Xeon E5-1650 is built on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1650 scores 8,056 against the Xeon X7560's 8,110 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon X7560. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1650 vs 24 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X7560.

Feature	Xeon E5-1650	Xeon X7560
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+42%	2.67 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+41%	2.27 GHz
L3 Cache	12288 kB (total)	24 MB L3 Cache+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)	—
PassMark	8,056	8,110

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1650 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon X7560 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-1650 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X7560 — the Xeon E5-1650 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support.

Feature	Xeon E5-1650	Xeon X7560
Socket	LGA2011	LGA1567
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	384 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	40	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon E5-1650 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon E5-1650 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-1650) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X7560). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1650 targets Workstation, Xeon X7560 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7560 rivals Core i7-980X.