Xeon E5-1680 v4 vs Xeon E5-2667 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1680 v4 vs Xeon E5-2667 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1680 v4 vs Xeon E5-2667 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1680 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon E5-2667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 135W instead of 140W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1680 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,776 vs 13,945).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1680 v4 better than Xeon E5-2667 v4?

Yes. Xeon E5-1680 v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1680 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1680 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1680 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-1680 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-1680 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-1680 v4 vs Xeon E5-2667 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-1680 v4

The Xeon E5-1680 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,945 points. Launch price was $1,723.

Xeon E5-2667 v4

The Xeon E5-2667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,776 points. Launch price was $2,057.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon E5-2667 v4 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v4 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v4 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1680 v4 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-1680 v4 uses the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1680 v4 scores 13,945 against the Xeon E5-2667 v4's 13,776 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-1680 v4. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v4 vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2667 v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-1680 v4	Xeon E5-2667 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4 GHz+11%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	25 MB+25%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-EP (2016)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	13,945+1%	13,776