Xeon E5-2403
VS
Celeron G4900

Xeon E5-2403 vs Celeron G4900

Intel

Xeon E5-2403

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron G4900

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2403 is positioned at rank #816 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2403

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17553%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3314%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2944%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2275%
#466
Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP: $4607|Avg: $3145
100%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
99%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
99%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
97%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
96%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
96%
#816
Xeon E5-2403
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#817
Xeon W3680
MSRP: $594|Avg: $26
100%
#819
Xeon E5-2640 v3
MSRP: $939|Avg: $189
99%
#824
Xeon E5-1660 v3
MSRP: $1080|Avg: $198
98%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4900

#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
149%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
140%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
140%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
138%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
133%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
130%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
128%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
124%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
124%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
119%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
117%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
116%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
109%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
102%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
101%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
100%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
99%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
94%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
92%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
85%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
80%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
73%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
71%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
50%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
28%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G4900 (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2403Celeron G4900
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2403 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2403Celeron G4900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2403 and Celeron G4900

Intel

Xeon E5-2403

The Xeon E5-2403 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $230.

Intel

Celeron G4900

The Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,370 points. Launch price was $42.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2403 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G4900 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon E5-2403 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2403 versus 3.1 GHz on the Celeron G4900 — a 53.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2403 uses the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G4900 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2403 scores 2,367 against the Celeron G4900's 2,370 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G4900. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2403 vs 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900.

FeatureXeon E5-2403Celeron G4900
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz+72%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz+72%
L3 Cache
10240 kB (total)+67%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
2,367
2,370
Geekbench 6 Single
850
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2403 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G4900 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2403Celeron G4900
Socket
LGA1356
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2403) / VT-x (Celeron G4900). The Celeron G4900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon E5-2403 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900 rivals Pentium G5400.

FeatureXeon E5-2403Celeron G4900
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget