Xeon E5-2403
VS
Celeron G3920

Xeon E5-2403 vs Celeron G3920

Intel

Xeon E5-2403

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron G3920

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2403 is positioned at rank 816 and the Celeron G3920 is on rank 364, so the Celeron G3920 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2403

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17553%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3314%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2944%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2275%
#466
Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP: $4607|Avg: $3145
100%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
99%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
99%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
97%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
96%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
96%
#816
Xeon E5-2403
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#817
Xeon W3680
MSRP: $594|Avg: $26
100%
#819
Xeon E5-2640 v3
MSRP: $939|Avg: $189
99%
#824
Xeon E5-1660 v3
MSRP: $1080|Avg: $198
98%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3920

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5288%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4996%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3628%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1093%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
866%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
757%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
434%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
428%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
390%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
390%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
385%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
375%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
370%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
368%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
365%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
99%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
99%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
99%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
98%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
97%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
96%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
95%
#364
Celeron G3920
MSRP: $40|Avg: $30
100%
#366
Ryzen 3 1200
MSRP: $109|Avg: $50
100%
#378
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2403 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2403Celeron G3920
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron G3920 ($30), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($30 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2403Celeron G3920
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2403 and Celeron G3920

Intel

Xeon E5-2403

The Xeon E5-2403 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $230.

Intel

Celeron G3920

The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2403 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3920 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon E5-2403 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2403 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3920 — a 46.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G3920 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon E5-2403 uses the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G3920 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2403 scores 2,367 against the Celeron G3920's 2,358 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2403. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2403 vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G3920.

FeatureXeon E5-2403Celeron G3920
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.9 GHz+61%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.9 GHz+61%
L3 Cache
10240 kB (total)+150%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,367
2,358
Geekbench 6 Single
699
Geekbench 6 Multi
948
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2403 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G3920 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2403Celeron G3920
Socket
LGA1356
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2403) / VT-x (Celeron G3920). The Celeron G3920 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Xeon E5-2403 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400.

FeatureXeon E5-2403Celeron G3920
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget