Xeon E5-2440 vs Xeon X5670

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2440 vs Xeon X5670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2440 vs Xeon X5670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2440

2012

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,091 vs 6,160).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($728 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).

Xeon X5670

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $661 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $728 MSRP).
✅Delivers 998.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.9 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($67 MSRP vs $728 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5670 better than Xeon E5-2440?

Yes. Xeon X5670 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5670 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5670 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5670 is the better buy right now. Xeon X5670 comes in $661 cheaper on MSRP at $67 MSRP versus $728 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 998.9% better value on MSRP (91.9 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2440 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2440 vs Xeon X5670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2440

The Xeon E5-2440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,091 points. Launch price was $295.

Xeon X5670

The Xeon X5670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,160 points. Launch price was $67.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2440 and Xeon X5670 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2440 versus 3.33 GHz on the Xeon X5670 — a 13.8% clock advantage for the Xeon X5670 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Xeon E5-2440 uses the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X5670 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2440 scores 6,091 against the Xeon X5670's 6,160 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon X5670. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2440 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5670.

Feature	Xeon E5-2440	Xeon X5670
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.33 GHz+15%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.93 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	15360 kB (total)+25%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,091	6,160+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2440 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5670 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2440	Xeon X5670
Socket	LGA1356	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2440) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5670). Primary use case: Xeon X5670 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5670 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Xeon E5-2440	Xeon X5670
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2440 was priced at $728, while the Xeon X5670 came in at $67. On launch pricing ($728 vs $67), Xeon X5670 was $661 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2440 delivers 8.4 pts/$ vs 91.9 pts/$ for the Xeon X5670 — making the Xeon X5670 the 166.6% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2440	Xeon X5670
MSRP	$728	$67-91%
Performance per Dollar	8.4	91.9+994%
Release Date	2012	2010

Search Xeon E5-2440 on Amazon

Search Xeon X5670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.