Xeon E5-2450
VS
Ryzen 7 3780U

Xeon E5-2450 vs Ryzen 7 3780U

Intel

Xeon E5-2450

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3780U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2450 is positioned at rank 839 and the Ryzen 7 3780U is on rank 906, so the Xeon E5-2450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2450

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
19137%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3613%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3210%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2480%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
100%
#476
EPYC 9745
MSRP: $12141|Avg: $10588
99%
#477
EPYC 7J13
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $150
99%
#478
EPYC 7702
MSRP: $6450|Avg: $2035
99%
#479
EPYC 7763
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $1513
99%
#480
EPYC 9734
MSRP: $9600|Avg: $6598
98%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
98%
#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
97%
#839
Xeon E5-2450
MSRP: $694|Avg: $795
100%
#840
Xeon E5-2630L v2
MSRP: $612|Avg: $149
100%
#842
Xeon E3-1246 v3
MSRP: $667|Avg: $215
100%
#843
Xeon W3540
MSRP: $284|Avg: $10
100%
#844
Xeon E-2124G
MSRP: $667|Avg: $462
100%
#852
Xeon E5-2407
MSRP: $250|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 3780U

#894
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1568%
#895
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1545%
#896
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1418%
#897
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1412%
#898
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1399%
#900
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1351%
#901
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1296%
#902
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1293%
#903
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1259%
#906
Ryzen 7 3780U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#911
Core i7-6820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
99%
#919
Core i5-8365UE
MSRP: $297|Avg: $297
98%
#921
A6 Pro-7050B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 7 3780U (2019) utilizes 12 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2450Ryzen 7 3780U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($795)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) / 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2450 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2450Ryzen 7 3780U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($795)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2450 and Ryzen 7 3780U

Intel

Xeon E5-2450

The Xeon E5-2450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,534 points. Launch price was $500.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3780U

The Ryzen 7 3780U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,483 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2450 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3780U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2450 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2450 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3780U — a 31.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3780U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2450 uses the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3780U uses Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2450 scores 7,534 against the Ryzen 7 3780U's 7,483 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2450. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2450 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3780U.

FeatureXeon E5-2450Ryzen 7 3780U
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
4 GHz+38%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz+10%
L3 Cache
20480 kB (total)+400%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
12 nm-63%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
PassMark
7,534
7,483
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2450 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3780U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2450Ryzen 7 3780U
Socket
LGA1356
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%