Xeon E5-2470 v2 vs Core i5-1335UE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2470 v2 is positioned at rank 337 and the Core i5-1335UE is on rank 628, so the Xeon E5-2470 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2470 v2

#1

Xeon Platinum 8454H

MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A

4856%

#6

Xeon Gold 6240R

MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A

917%

#10

Xeon 6337P

MSRP: $60|Avg: $5

815%

#15

EPYC 9174F

MSRP: $194|Avg: $30

629%

#247

EPYC 7443P

MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045

99%

#248

EPYC 4564P

MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517

99%

#249

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340

99%

#250

EPYC 7D12

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

99%

#251

Xeon W-1390P

MSRP: $594|Avg: $450

98%

#337

Xeon E5-2470 v2

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-1335UE

#187

Core Ultra 9 288V

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

97%

#188

Core i7-10870H

MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A

97%

#616

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

840%

#617

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

827%

#618

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

760%

#619

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

756%

#620

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

749%

#622

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

724%

#623

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

694%

#624

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

693%

#625

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

674%

#628

Core i5-1335UE

MSRP: $312|Avg: $312

100%

#638

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

MSRP: $80|Avg: $10

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-1335UE (2023) utilizes 10 nm technology and **DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Xeon E5-2470 v2	Core i5-1335UE
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($50)	⚠️ Higher cost ($312)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) / 22 nm)	✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-U (2023) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2470 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Xeon E5-2470 v2	Core i5-1335UE
Cost Efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+512%)	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($50)	⚠️ Higher cost ($312)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon E5-2470 v2 Benchmark Check

Core i5-1335UE Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2470 v2 and Core i5-1335UE

Xeon E5-2470 v2

The Xeon E5-2470 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,701 points. Launch price was $800.

Core i5-1335UE

The Core i5-1335UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 10,902 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2470 v2 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, matching the Core i5-1335UE's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2470 v2 versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-1335UE — a 33.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-1335UE (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2470 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-1335UE uses Raptor Lake-U (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2470 v2 scores 10,701 against the Core i5-1335UE's 10,902 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i5-1335UE. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2470 v2 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1335UE.

Feature	Xeon E5-2470 v2	Core i5-1335UE
Cores / Threads	10 / 20	10 / 12
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.5 GHz+41%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+85%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)+108%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	22 nm	10 nm-55%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)	Raptor Lake-U (2023)
PassMark	10,701	10,902+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2470 v2 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-1335UE uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2470 v2	Core i5-1335UE
Socket	LGA1356	FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%

💰

Value Analysis

At current prices ($50 vs $312), the Xeon E5-2470 v2 is $262 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2470 v2 delivers 214.0 pts/$ vs 34.9 pts/$ for the Core i5-1335UE — making the Xeon E5-2470 v2 the 143.9% better value option.