Xeon E5-2603 v4
VS
Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Xeon E5-2603 v4 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Intel

Xeon E5-2603 v4

6 Cores6 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core 2 Extreme QX9770

4 Cores4 Thrd136 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2603 v4 is positioned at rank 589 and the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is on rank 1088, so the Xeon E5-2603 v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2603 v4

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9200%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1737%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1543%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1192%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
99%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
98%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
97%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
96%
#358
Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP: $2889|Avg: $468
96%
#359
Xeon Gold 6530
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1846
96%
#359
EPYC 9354
MSRP: $3420|Avg: $2498
96%
#361
Xeon Silver 4114
MSRP: $612|Avg: $30
95%
#589
Xeon E5-2603 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#590
Xeon W-2125
MSRP: $444|Avg: $42
100%
#592
EPYC 7261
MSRP: $501|Avg: $8
98%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Extreme QX9770

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
94459%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
89255%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
64806%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
19523%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
15465%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
13528%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7748%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7647%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6963%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6962%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6885%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6699%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6605%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6578%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6519%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
100%
#1089
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
100%
#1090
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
99%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
98%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
94%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
92%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
86%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
79%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
72%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
69%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
68%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
65%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
64%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
59%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Xeon E5-2603 v4 (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2603 v4Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,399)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2603 v4Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,399)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2603 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Intel

Xeon E5-2603 v4

The Xeon E5-2603 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,517 points. Launch price was $213.

Intel

Core 2 Extreme QX9770

The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 136 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,611 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2603 v4 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2603 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 v4 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 — a 61.2% clock advantage for the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2603 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2603 v4 scores 4,517 against the Core 2 Extreme QX9770's 4,611 — a 2.1% lead for the Core 2 Extreme QX9770. L3 cache: 15 MB on the Xeon E5-2603 v4 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v4Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+50%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
3.2 GHz+88%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
3.2 GHz+88%
L3 Cache
15 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
12 MB (total)+700%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
PassMark
4,517
4,611+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,200
Geekbench 6 Single
451
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,583
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2603 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v4Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Socket
LGA2011
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2603 v4) / VT-x (Core 2 Extreme QX9770). Primary use case: Core 2 Extreme QX9770 targets Enthusiast.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v4Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Enthusiast