Xeon E5-2608L V3
VS
FX-9370

Xeon E5-2608L V3 vs FX-9370

Intel

Xeon E5-2608L V3

6 Cores6 Thrd52 WWMax: 2 GHz2014
VS
AMD

FX-9370

8 Cores8 Thrd220 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2608L V3 is positioned at rank 450 and the FX-9370 is on rank 61, so the FX-9370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2608L V3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
6478%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1223%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1087%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
840%
#290
Xeon Gold 5420+
MSRP: $1848|Avg: $1848
98%
#292
Xeon w7-2575X
MSRP: $1689|Avg: $1860
98%
#294
Xeon Gold 6444Y
MSRP: $3622|Avg: N/A
97%
#295
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
MSRP: $2649|Avg: $2782
97%
#450
Xeon E5-2608L V3
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#451
Xeon D-1718T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $302
100%
#452
Xeon D-1622
MSRP: $195|Avg: $170
99%
#453
Xeon E3-1290 v2
MSRP: $885|Avg: $125
99%
#454
Xeon E5-2420 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $112
99%
#455
Xeon E3-1285 v6
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
99%
#456
Xeon E3-1268L v5
MSRP: $377|Avg: $93
99%
#460
Xeon E5-1428L V2
MSRP: $494|Avg: $83
98%
#461
Xeon E5-1428L
MSRP: $480|Avg: N/A
98%
#463
Xeon E5-2620 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $54
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-9370

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
2054%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
1941%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
1409%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
425%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
336%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
294%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
168%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
166%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
151%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
151%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
150%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
146%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
144%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
143%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
142%
#59
Core i5-9500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $65
100%
#60
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
99%
#61
FX-9370
MSRP: $42|Avg: $60
100%
#61
Core i9-9960X
MSRP: $1684|Avg: $200
99%
#62
Core Ultra 5 225T
MSRP: $240|Avg: $180
98%
#63
Ryzen 3 3300X
MSRP: $120|Avg: $90
98%
#64
Core i5-12600K
MSRP: $289|Avg: $185
98%
#65
Core Ultra 5 235
MSRP: $257|Avg: $269
98%
#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
98%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
98%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
97%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
97%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
96%
#71
Core i5-14490F
MSRP: $209|Avg: $190
96%
#72
Core i5-12600KF
MSRP: $264|Avg: $190
96%
#73
Core i5-13600KF
MSRP: $249|Avg: $258
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2608L V3 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2608L V3FX-9370
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-9370 ($60), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($60 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2608L V3FX-9370
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2608L V3 and FX-9370

Intel

Xeon E5-2608L V3

The Xeon E5-2608L V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 52 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 6,415 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

FX-9370

The FX-9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,374 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2608L V3 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the FX-9370 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-9370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L V3 versus 4.7 GHz on the FX-9370 — a 80.6% clock advantage for the FX-9370. The Xeon E5-2608L V3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-9370 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2608L V3 scores 6,415 against the FX-9370's 6,374 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2608L V3.

FeatureXeon E5-2608L V3FX-9370
Cores / Threads
6 / 6
8 / 8+33%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
4.7 GHz+135%
Base Clock
4.4 GHz
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
8192 kB+3100%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark
6,415
6,374
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2608L V3 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9370 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2608L V3FX-9370
Socket
LGA2011-3
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0