Xeon E5-2609 v2
VS
Athlon X4 840

Xeon E5-2609 v2 vs Athlon X4 840

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Athlon X4 840

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is positioned at rank 667 and the Athlon X4 840 is on rank 563, so the Athlon X4 840 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12334%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2329%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2069%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1598%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
100%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
99%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#397
Xeon W-3235
MSRP: $1538|Avg: $1538
99%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
98%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
97%
#667
Xeon E5-2609 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
100%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
100%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
100%
#674
Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
99%
#676
Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $68
98%
#678
Xeon W5590
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 840

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9544%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9018%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6548%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1973%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1563%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1367%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
783%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
773%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
704%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
703%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
696%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
677%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
667%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
665%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
659%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
100%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
100%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
99%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
98%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
98%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
98%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
98%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
98%
#573
Core i5-7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
98%
#574
Core i7-7700
MSRP: $272|Avg: $102
97%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
97%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
97%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
97%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v2Athlon X4 840
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon X4 840 ($25), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($25 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v2Athlon X4 840
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2609 v2 and Athlon X4 840

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v2

The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,369 points. Launch price was $396.

AMD

Athlon X4 840

The Athlon X4 840 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,331 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2609 v2 and Athlon X4 840 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v2 versus 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 840 — a 41.3% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 840 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2609 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon X4 840 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2609 v2 scores 3,369 against the Athlon X4 840's 3,331 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2609 v2.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v2Athlon X4 840
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
3.8 GHz+52%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz+24%
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4 MB+1500%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark
3,369+1%
3,331
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2609 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X4 840 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v2Athlon X4 840
Socket
LGA2011
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16