Xeon E5-2609 v2
VS
Core i3-4370T

Xeon E5-2609 v2 vs Core i3-4370T

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i3-4370T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is positioned at rank 667 and the Core i3-4370T is on rank 700, so the Xeon E5-2609 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12334%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2329%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2069%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1598%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
100%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
99%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#397
Xeon W-3235
MSRP: $1538|Avg: $1538
99%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
98%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
97%
#667
Xeon E5-2609 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
100%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
100%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
100%
#674
Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
99%
#676
Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $68
98%
#678
Xeon W5590
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4370T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12796%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12091%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8779%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2645%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2095%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1833%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1050%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1036%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
943%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
943%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
933%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
907%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
895%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
891%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
883%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
98%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
100%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
100%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
100%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
99%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
99%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
99%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
99%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
98%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
97%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
97%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
97%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v2Core i3-4370T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($138)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-4370T ($138), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($138 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v2Core i3-4370T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($138)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2609 v2 and Core i3-4370T

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v2

The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,369 points. Launch price was $396.

Intel

Core i3-4370T

The Core i3-4370T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,361 points. Launch price was $138.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2609 v2 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4370T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2609 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v2 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-4370T — a 27.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-4370T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2609 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-4370T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2609 v2 scores 3,369 against the Core i3-4370T's 3,361 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2609 v2. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2609 v2 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4370T.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v2Core i3-4370T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz+32%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)+150%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,369
3,361
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2609 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4370T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v2Core i3-4370T
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2609 v2) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4370T). The Core i3-4370T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E5-2609 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4370T targets Desktop Low Power.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v2Core i3-4370T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop Low Power