Xeon E5-2609 v2
VS
Core i7-960

Xeon E5-2609 v2 vs Core i7-960

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i7-960

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is positioned at rank 667 and the Core i7-960 is on rank 979, so the Xeon E5-2609 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12334%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2329%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2069%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1598%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
100%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
99%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#397
Xeon W-3235
MSRP: $1538|Avg: $1538
99%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
98%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
97%
#667
Xeon E5-2609 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
100%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
100%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
100%
#674
Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
99%
#676
Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $68
98%
#678
Xeon W5590
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-960

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
28338%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
26776%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
19442%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5857%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4639%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4059%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2325%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2294%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2089%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2089%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2065%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2010%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1982%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1974%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1956%
#978
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
100%
#980
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
100%
#981
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
99%
#982
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
99%
#983
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
98%
#984
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
97%
#985
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
96%
#986
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
96%
#987
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
95%
#988
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
95%
#989
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
95%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
93%
#991
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
93%
#992
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v2Core i7-960
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-960 ($110), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($110 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v2Core i7-960
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2609 v2 and Core i7-960

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v2

The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,369 points. Launch price was $396.

Intel

Core i7-960

The Core i7-960 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,400 points. Launch price was $316.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2609 v2 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-960's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v2 versus 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-960 — a 32.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-960 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2609 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-960 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2609 v2 scores 3,369 against the Core i7-960's 3,400 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-960. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2609 v2 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-960.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v2Core i7-960
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
3.46 GHz+38%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)+25%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark
3,369
3,400
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2609 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-960 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v2Core i7-960
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0