Xeon E5-2609 v4
VS
Core i3-8300T

Xeon E5-2609 v4 vs Core i3-8300T

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v4

8 Cores8 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i3-8300T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2609 v4 is positioned at rank #526 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v4

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
7672%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1448%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1287%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
994%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
98%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
98%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
97%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
97%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
96%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
96%
#331
EPYC 7402
MSRP: $1783|Avg: $2285
95%
#526
Xeon E5-2609 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#536
Xeon E3-1241 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $27
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-8300T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
1449%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
1369%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
994%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
299%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
237%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
208%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
119%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
117%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
107%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
107%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
106%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
103%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
101%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
101%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
100%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
98%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
96%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
95%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
94%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
93%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
90%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
88%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
87%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
87%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
86%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
85%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
85%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
84%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
83%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-8300T (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v4Core i3-8300T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2609 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v4Core i3-8300T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core i3-8300T

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v4

The Xeon E5-2609 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,418 points. Launch price was $306.

Intel

Core i3-8300T

The Core i3-8300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,378 points. Launch price was $138.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2609 v4 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-8300T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2609 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v4 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-8300T — a 61.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-8300T (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2609 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-8300T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2609 v4 scores 5,418 against the Core i3-8300T's 5,378 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2609 v4. L3 cache: 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2609 v4 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-8300T.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v4Core i3-8300T
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
3.2 GHz+88%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
3.2 GHz+88%
L3 Cache
20 MB+150%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
5,418
5,378
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2609 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-8300T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v4Core i3-8300T
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2609 v4) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8300T). The Core i3-8300T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2609 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300T targets Desktop.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v4Core i3-8300T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop