Xeon E5-2609 v4
VS
Core i5-6400

Xeon E5-2609 v4 vs Core i5-6400

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v4

8 Cores8 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i5-6400

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2609 v4 is positioned at rank 526 and the Core i5-6400 is on rank 600, so the Xeon E5-2609 v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v4

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
7672%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1448%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1287%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
994%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
98%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
98%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
97%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
97%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
96%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
96%
#331
EPYC 7402
MSRP: $1783|Avg: $2285
95%
#526
Xeon E5-2609 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#536
Xeon E3-1241 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $27
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10474%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9897%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7186%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2165%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1715%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1500%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
859%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
848%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
772%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
772%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
763%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
743%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
732%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
729%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
723%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
96%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
100%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
99%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
99%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
99%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
99%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
99%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
98%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
97%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
96%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
96%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2609 v4 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v4Core i5-6400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($57)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-6400 ($57), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($57 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v4Core i5-6400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($57)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core i5-6400

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v4

The Xeon E5-2609 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,418 points. Launch price was $306.

Intel

Core i5-6400

The Core i5-6400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $187.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2609 v4 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-6400 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2609 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v4 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-6400 — a 64% clock advantage for the Core i5-6400 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon E5-2609 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-6400 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2609 v4 scores 5,418 against the Core i5-6400's 5,417 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2609 v4. L3 cache: 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2609 v4 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-6400.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v4Core i5-6400
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
3.3 GHz+94%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
2.7 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
20 MB+233%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
5,418
5,417
Geekbench 6 Single
950
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2609 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v4Core i5-6400
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2609 v4) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6400). The Core i5-6400 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon E5-2609 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6400 targets Mainstream Desktop.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v4Core i5-6400
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Desktop