Xeon E5-2609
VS
A10-5800K

Xeon E5-2609 vs A10-5800K

Intel

Xeon E5-2609

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012
VS
AMD

A10-5800K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2609 is positioned at rank 725 and the A10-5800K is on rank 430, so the A10-5800K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14118%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2666%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2368%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1830%
#423
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP: $6499|Avg: $3444
99%
#424
Xeon W-2155
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $150
98%
#425
Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP: $3583|Avg: $2097
98%
#425
Xeon 6740E
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $3949
98%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
98%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
97%
#725
Xeon E5-2609
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#728
Xeon E5-2609 v3
MSRP: $306|Avg: $306
99%
#731
Xeon Bronze 3106
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
99%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
98%
#737
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-5800K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6313%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5965%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4331%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1305%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1033%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
904%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
518%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
511%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
465%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
465%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
460%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
448%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
441%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
440%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
436%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
100%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
99%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
99%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
95%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
95%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
95%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
94%
#430
A10-5800K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
99%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
98%
#436
Ryzen 5 1500X
MSRP: $189|Avg: $67
97%
#444
Pentium G4560T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $20
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2609 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2609A10-5800K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10-5800K ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2609A10-5800K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2609 and A10-5800K

Intel

Xeon E5-2609

The Xeon E5-2609 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,943 points. Launch price was $143.

AMD

A10-5800K

The A10-5800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,963 points. Launch price was $122.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2609 and A10-5800K share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 versus 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800K — a 54.5% clock advantage for the A10-5800K (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2609 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the A10-5800K uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2609 scores 2,943 against the A10-5800K's 2,963 — a 0.7% lead for the A10-5800K. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2609 vs 0 kB on the A10-5800K.

FeatureXeon E5-2609A10-5800K
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
4.2 GHz+75%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.8 GHz+58%
L3 Cache
10240 kB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,943
2,963
Geekbench 6 Single
461
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2609 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10-5800K uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2609A10-5800K
Socket
LGA2011
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2609) / AMD-V (A10-5800K). The A10-5800K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Xeon E5-2609 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-5800K rivals Core i3-3225.

FeatureXeon E5-2609A10-5800K
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7660D
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget