Xeon E5-2618L V3 vs Xeon E5-2630 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2618L V3 vs Xeon E5-2630 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2618L V3 vs Xeon E5-2630 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2618L V3

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 85W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2630 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,310 vs 11,434).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon E5-2630 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,171 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2618L V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2630 v4 better than Xeon E5-2618L V3?

Yes. Xeon E5-2630 v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2630 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2630 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2630 v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2630 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,171 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2630 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014), 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2618L V3 vs Xeon E5-2630 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2618L V3

The Xeon E5-2618L V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 11,310 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2630 v4

The Xeon E5-2630 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,434 points. Launch price was $667.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2618L V3 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2630 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L V3 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2618L V3 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2618L V3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2618L V3 scores 11,310 against the Xeon E5-2630 v4's 11,434 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2630 v4. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2618L V3 vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2630 v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-2618L V3	Xeon E5-2630 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+10%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+5%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	25 MB+25%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+10140%	2.5 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	11,310	11,434+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,032
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,368

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2618L V3 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2618L V3	Xeon E5-2630 v4
Socket	LGA2011-3	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4 1600/1866/2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2618L V3) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E5-2630 v4). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2630 v4 targets Workstation / Server.