Xeon E5-2628L v4 vs Core 7 160UL
Xeon E5-2628L v4
Core 7 160UL
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2628L v4 is positioned at rank #465 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2628L v4
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2628L v4 | Core 7 160UL |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-PS (2024) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2628L v4 | Core 7 160UL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Core 7 160UL
Xeon E5-2628L v4
The Xeon E5-2628L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,079 points. Launch price was $1,364.
Core 7 160UL
The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2628L v4 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core 7 160UL offers 10 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2628L v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2628L v4 versus 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL — a 93% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL. The Xeon E5-2628L v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 7 160UL uses Raptor Lake-PS (2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2628L v4 scores 11,079 against the Core 7 160UL's 11,043 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2628L v4. L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon E5-2628L v4 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2628L v4 | Core 7 160UL |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+20% | 10 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz | 5.2 GHz+174% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB+150% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+140% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) |
| PassMark | 11,079 | 11,043 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Core 7 160UL
