Xeon E5-2628L v4
VS
Xeon Silver 4209T

Xeon E5-2628L v4 vs Xeon Silver 4209T

Intel

Xeon E5-2628L v4

12 Cores24 Thrd75 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4209T

8 Cores16 Thrd70 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2628L v4 is positioned at rank 465 and the Xeon Silver 4209T is on rank 626, so the Xeon E5-2628L v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2628L v4

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7033%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6646%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4825%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1454%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1151%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1007%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
577%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
569%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
518%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
518%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
513%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
499%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
492%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
490%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
485%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
99%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
99%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
98%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
97%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
97%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
97%
#465
Xeon E5-2628L v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#466
Pentium G4600
MSRP: $82|Avg: $116
100%
#467
Celeron G3900TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $45
99%
#471
Pentium G4620
MSRP: $86|Avg: $154
99%
#476
Athlon X4 830
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
97%
#480
Athlon X4 860K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Silver 4209T

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
10560%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1994%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1771%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1368%
#374
Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP: $3658|Avg: N/A
100%
#375
Xeon D-2766NT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $212
100%
#376
Xeon Gold 6442Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
99%
#377
Xeon 6740P
MSRP: $4650|Avg: $4650
99%
#378
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
MSRP: $7999|Avg: $7999
98%
#379
Xeon W-3345
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $3319
98%
#380
Xeon Gold 6526Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
97%
#626
Xeon Silver 4209T
MSRP: $563|Avg: $649
100%
#627
Xeon E3-1240
MSRP: $273|Avg: $39
100%
#636
Xeon E5-2680 v2
MSRP: $667|Avg: $462
97%
#640
Xeon W-2104
MSRP: $294|Avg: $309
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Xeon Silver 4209T (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2628L v4Xeon Silver 4209T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($649)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2628L v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2628L v4Xeon Silver 4209T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($649)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon Silver 4209T

Intel

Xeon E5-2628L v4

The Xeon E5-2628L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,079 points. Launch price was $1,364.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4209T

The Xeon Silver 4209T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 11,080 points. Launch price was $501.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2628L v4 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4209T offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2628L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2628L v4 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4209T — a 51% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4209T. The Xeon E5-2628L v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4209T uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2628L v4 scores 11,079 against the Xeon Silver 4209T's 11,080 — a 0% lead for the Xeon Silver 4209T. L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon E5-2628L v4 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4209T.

FeatureXeon E5-2628L v4Xeon Silver 4209T
Cores / Threads
12 / 24+50%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
3.2 GHz+68%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
30 MB+173%
11 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
8 MB+167%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
11,079
11,080