
Xeon E5-2628L v4 vs Xeon Silver 4209T

Xeon E5-2628L v4

Xeon Silver 4209T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2628L v4 is positioned at rank 465 and the Xeon Silver 4209T is on rank 626, so the Xeon E5-2628L v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2628L v4
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Silver 4209T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2628L v4 | Xeon Silver 4209T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($649) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2628L v4 | Xeon Silver 4209T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($649) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon Silver 4209T

Xeon E5-2628L v4
The Xeon E5-2628L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,079 points. Launch price was $1,364.

Xeon Silver 4209T
The Xeon Silver 4209T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 11,080 points. Launch price was $501.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2628L v4 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4209T offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2628L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2628L v4 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4209T — a 51% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4209T. The Xeon E5-2628L v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4209T uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2628L v4 scores 11,079 against the Xeon Silver 4209T's 11,080 — a 0% lead for the Xeon Silver 4209T. L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon E5-2628L v4 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4209T.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2628L v4 | Xeon Silver 4209T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz+68% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB+173% | 11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 11,079 | 11,080 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















