Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2643 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2643 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2643 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2630 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 85W instead of 135W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5-2643 v3

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,265 vs 10,270).
❌Launch MSRP is still $219 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2630 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌58.8% higher power demand at 135W vs 85W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2630 v3 better than Xeon E5-2643 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2643 v3 is ahead with a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2630 v3 pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2630 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2630 v3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2643 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2630 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $219 MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2643 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2643 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (46.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2630 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2643 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2630 v3

The Xeon E5-2630 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 10,270 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2643 v3

The Xeon E5-2643 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 10,265 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2630 v3 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2643 v3 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2630 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v3 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2643 v3 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2643 v3 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). Both are built on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2630 v3 scores 10,270 against the Xeon E5-2643 v3's 10,265 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2630 v3. Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon E5-2630 v3	Xeon E5-2643 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.7 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.4 GHz+42%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	10,270	10,265