Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4110

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2630 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 11 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,270 vs 10,314).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4110

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2630 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 20 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4110 better than Xeon E5-2630 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2630 v3 is ahead with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4110 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2630 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 81.8% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 11 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4110 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Silver 4110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2630 v3

The Xeon E5-2630 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 10,270 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4110

The Xeon Silver 4110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,314 points. Launch price was $501.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Xeon Silver 4110 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v3 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4110 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2630 v3 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2630 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2630 v3 scores 10,270 against the Xeon Silver 4110's 10,314 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Silver 4110. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4110.

Feature	Xeon E5-2630 v3	Xeon Silver 4110
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+82%	11 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+3100%	8 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	10,270	10,314

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2630 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.