Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2687W

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2687W FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2687W: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2630 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 85W instead of 150W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5-2687W

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2630 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,036 vs 10,270).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,885 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2630 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌76.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 85W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2630 v3 better than Xeon E5-2687W?

Yes. Xeon E5-2630 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2630 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2630 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2630 v3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2687W is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2630 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,885 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2687W is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2630 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Xeon E5-2687W Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2630 v3

The Xeon E5-2630 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 10,270 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2687W

The Xeon E5-2687W is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,036 points. Launch price was $815.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Xeon E5-2687W share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v3 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2687W (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2630 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2630 v3 scores 10,270 against the Xeon E5-2687W's 10,036 — a 2.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2630 v3. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2687W.

Feature	Xeon E5-2630 v3	Xeon E5-2687W
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.8 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.1 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	20480 kB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	10,270+2%	10,036