Xeon E5-2637 vs A10-5800K
Xeon E5-2637
A10-5800K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2637 is positioned at rank 1010 and the A10-5800K is on rank 430, so the A10-5800K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2637
Performance Per Dollar A10-5800K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2637 | A10-5800K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2637 | A10-5800K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2637 and A10-5800K
Xeon E5-2637
The Xeon E5-2637 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 5120 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,978 points. Launch price was $800.
A10-5800K
The A10-5800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,963 points. Launch price was $122.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2637 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A10-5800K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5800K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 versus 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800K — a 18.2% clock advantage for the A10-5800K (base: 3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2637 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the A10-5800K uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2637 scores 2,978 against the A10-5800K's 2,963 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2637. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 550 vs 461, a 17.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2637 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 5120 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2637 vs 0 kB on the A10-5800K.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2637 | A10-5800K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 5120 kB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,978 | 2,963 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 550+19% | 461 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2637 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the A10-5800K uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2637 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2637) vs 2 (A10-5800K). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2637) vs 16 (A10-5800K) — the Xeon E5-2637 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C600,X79 (Xeon E5-2637) and A55,A58,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-5800K).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2637 | A10-5800K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 384 GB+1100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40+150% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the A10-5800K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2637) vs AMD-V (A10-5800K). The A10-5800K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Xeon E5-2637 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2637 targets Server, A10-5800K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-5800K rivals Core i3-3225.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2637 | A10-5800K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon HD 7660D |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Server | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2637 and A10-5800K
