Xeon E5-2637 vs Athlon X4 760K
Xeon E5-2637
Athlon X4 760K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2637 is positioned at rank 1010 and the Athlon X4 760K is on rank 599, so the Athlon X4 760K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2637
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 760K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2637 | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2637 | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+100%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2637 and Athlon X4 760K
Xeon E5-2637
The Xeon E5-2637 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 5120 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,978 points. Launch price was $800.
Athlon X4 760K
The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2637 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X4 760K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 760K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 versus 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K — a 15.8% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K (base: 3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2637 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X4 760K uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2637 scores 2,978 against the Athlon X4 760K's 2,982 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon X4 760K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 550 vs 495, a 10.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2637 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,500 vs 1,404 (6.6% advantage for the Xeon E5-2637).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2637 | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.1 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 5120 kB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4 MB+1500% |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 2,978 | 2,982 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 550+11% | 495 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,500+7% | 1,404 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2637 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Athlon X4 760K uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2637 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2637) vs 2 (Athlon X4 760K). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2637) vs 16 (Athlon X4 760K) — the Xeon E5-2637 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C600,X79 (Xeon E5-2637) and A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X4 760K).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2637 | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 384 GB+1100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40+150% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon X4 760K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2637) vs AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2637 targets Server, Athlon X4 760K targets Budget.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2637 | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Server | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2637 launched at $885 MSRP, while the Athlon X4 760K debuted at $100. At current prices ($40 vs $20), the Athlon X4 760K is $20 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2637 delivers 74.5 pts/$ vs 149.1 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 760K — making the Athlon X4 760K the 66.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2637 | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $885 | $100-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $20-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.5 | 149.1+100% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2637 and Athlon X4 760K
