Xeon E5-2640 v3
VS
Core 7 160UL

Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Core 7 160UL

Intel

Xeon E5-2640 v3

8 Cores16 Thrd90 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core 7 160UL

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is positioned at rank #819 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2640 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17657%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3334%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2962%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2288%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
100%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
100%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
98%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
97%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
97%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
96%
#819
Xeon E5-2640 v3
MSRP: $939|Avg: $189
100%
#824
Xeon E5-1660 v3
MSRP: $1080|Avg: $198
99%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core 7 160UL (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2640 v3Core 7 160UL
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($189)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-PS (2024) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2640 v3Core 7 160UL
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($189)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Core 7 160UL

Intel

Xeon E5-2640 v3

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 11,055 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core 7 160UL

The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core 7 160UL offers 10 cores / 12 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 versus 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL — a 41.9% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 7 160UL uses Raptor Lake-PS (2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2640 v3 scores 11,055 against the Core 7 160UL's 11,043 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2640 v3. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL.

FeatureXeon E5-2640 v3Core 7 160UL
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
10 / 12+25%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
5.2 GHz+53%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+44%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+67%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process
22 nm
10 nm-55%
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
PassMark
11,055
11,043
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core 7 160UL uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2640 v3Core 7 160UL
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2640 v3) / not specified (Core 7 160UL). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2640 v3 targets Server.

FeatureXeon E5-2640 v3Core 7 160UL
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server