Xeon E5-2640 v3
VS
Core i7-13700K

Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Core i7-13700K

Intel

Xeon E5-2640 v3

8 Cores16 Thrd90 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i7-13700K

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is positioned at rank #819 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2640 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17657%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3334%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2962%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2288%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
100%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
100%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
98%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
97%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
97%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
96%
#819
Xeon E5-2640 v3
MSRP: $939|Avg: $189
100%
#824
Xeon E5-1660 v3
MSRP: $1080|Avg: $198
99%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700K

#131
Core Ultra 5 245T
MSRP: $270|Avg: $270
105%
#132
Core i5-8500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $80
104%
#133
Core i5-9400F
MSRP: $182|Avg: $80
103%
#134
Core i5-11400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $141
103%
#135
Core i5-13600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $319
103%
#136
Core i5-13500
MSRP: $242|Avg: $264
103%
#137
Ryzen 7 8700G
MSRP: $329|Avg: $269
103%
#138
Core i7-14700
MSRP: $384|Avg: $348
103%
#139
Ryzen 5 2500X
MSRP: $159|Avg: $80
103%
#140
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
102%
#141
Core i9-13900K
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
102%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
101%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
100%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
100%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
100%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
100%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
99%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
99%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
99%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
98%
#151
Core Ultra 7 265T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $362
98%
#152
Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $85|Avg: $64
98%
#153
Core i3-9100T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
98%
#154
Ryzen 5 4600G
MSRP: $154|Avg: $143
98%
#155
Core i7-13700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
97%
#156
Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $350
97%
#157
Core i7-13700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $345
97%
#158
Core i5-13600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
97%
#159
Ryzen 5 3400GE
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
96%
#160
Core i7-12700F
MSRP: $314|Avg: $275
96%
#161
Core i5-9400
MSRP: $192|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-13700K (2022) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2640 v3Core i7-13700K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($189)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2640 v3Core i7-13700K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+96%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($189)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Core i7-13700K

Intel

Xeon E5-2640 v3

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 11,055 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 45.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2640 v3 scores 11,055 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 122.2% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.

FeatureXeon E5-2640 v3Core i7-13700K
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 24+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
5.4 GHz+59%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz+31%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (per core)+700%
Process
22 nm
Intel 7 nm-68%
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
PassMark
11,055
45,784+314%
Cinebench R23 Multi
31,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,846
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,980
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2640 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2640 v3) vs 2 (Core i7-13700K). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2640 v3) vs 20 (Core i7-13700K) — the Xeon E5-2640 v3 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2640 v3) and Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K).

FeatureXeon E5-2640 v3Core i7-13700K
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866
DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB+300%
192 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40+100%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon E5-2640 v3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2640 v3) vs true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2640 v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

FeatureXeon E5-2640 v3Core i7-13700K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 launched at $939 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. At current prices ($189 vs $400), the Xeon E5-2640 v3 is $211 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2640 v3 delivers 58.5 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core i7-13700K the 64.7% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-2640 v3Core i7-13700K
MSRP
$939
$409-56%
Avg Price (30d)
$189-53%
$400
Performance per Dollar
58.5
114.5+96%
Release Date
2014
2022