Xeon E5-2643 vs Core i5-4670S
Xeon E5-2643
Core i5-4670S
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2643 is positioned at rank 1009 and the Core i5-4670S is on rank 693, so the Core i5-4670S offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2643
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4670S
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2643 | Core i5-4670S |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($30) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2643 | Core i5-4670S |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+67%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2643 and Core i5-4670S
Xeon E5-2643
The Xeon E5-2643 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,228 points. Launch price was $218.
Core i5-4670S
The Core i5-4670S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,252 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2643 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-4670S's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2643 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670S — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670S (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2643 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4670S uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2643 scores 5,228 against the Core i5-4670S's 5,252 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-4670S. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2643 vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670S.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2643 | Core i5-4670S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+6% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 10240 kB (total)+67% | 6144 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,228 | 5,252 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2643 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-4670S uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2643 | Core i5-4670S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2643) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670S). The Core i5-4670S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E5-2643 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670S targets Desktop Low Power.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2643 | Core i5-4670S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop Low Power |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2643 launched at $1552 MSRP, while the Core i5-4670S debuted at $213. At current prices ($50 vs $30), the Core i5-4670S is $20 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2643 delivers 104.6 pts/$ vs 175.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-4670S — making the Core i5-4670S the 50.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2643 | Core i5-4670S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1552 | $213-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $30-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.6 | 175.1+67% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2643 and Core i5-4670S
