Xeon E5-2648L v4 vs Xeon E5-4657L v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2648L v4 vs Xeon E5-4657L v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2648L v4 vs Xeon E5-4657L v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2648L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5-4657L v2

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,613 vs 11,839).
❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2648L v4 better than Xeon E5-4657L v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-4657L v2 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2648L v4 pulls ahead with 1.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2648L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2648L v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2648L v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2648L v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 28 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2648L v4 vs Xeon E5-4657L v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2648L v4

The Xeon E5-2648L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,839 points. Launch price was $1,544.

Xeon E5-4657L v2

The Xeon E5-4657L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 11,613 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2648L v4 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon E5-4657L v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2648L v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2648L v4 versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4657L v2 — a 46.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-4657L v2. The Xeon E5-2648L v4 is built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2648L v4 scores 11,839 against the Xeon E5-4657L v2's 11,613 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2648L v4. L3 cache: 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2648L v4 vs 30 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-4657L v2.

Feature	Xeon E5-2648L v4	Xeon E5-4657L v2
Cores / Threads	14 / 28+17%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+61%
Base Clock	—	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	35 MB+17%	30 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	3.5 MB	—
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	—
PassMark	11,839+2%	11,613