Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2648L v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2648L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2648L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6315P

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2648L v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,721 vs 11,839).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,166 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2648L v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2648L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2648L v4 better than Xeon 6315P?

Yes. Xeon E5-2648L v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 22.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2648L v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2648L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2648L v4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 6315P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2648L v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,166 MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 6315P is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6315P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of the older platform. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2648L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6315P

The Xeon 6315P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 11,721 points. Launch price was $213.

Xeon E5-2648L v4

The Xeon E5-2648L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,839 points. Launch price was $1,544.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6315P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2648L v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2648L v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon 6315P versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2648L v4 — a 85.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6315P. The Xeon 6315P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2648L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6315P scores 11,721 against the Xeon E5-2648L v4's 11,839 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2648L v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6315P vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2648L v4.

Feature	Xeon 6315P	Xeon E5-2648L v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	14 / 28+250%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+150%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	35 MB+192%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	3.5 MB+180%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	11,721	11,839+1%