Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2648L v4
Xeon 6315P
Xeon E5-2648L v4
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon 6315P is positioned at rank 871 and the Xeon E5-2648L v4 is on rank 439, so the Xeon E5-2648L v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6315P
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2648L v4
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6315P | Xeon E5-2648L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($160) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) / Intel 7 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6315P | Xeon E5-2648L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($160) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6315P and Xeon E5-2648L v4
Xeon 6315P
The Xeon 6315P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 11,721 points. Launch price was $213.
Xeon E5-2648L v4
The Xeon E5-2648L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,839 points. Launch price was $1,544.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6315P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2648L v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2648L v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon 6315P versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2648L v4 — a 85.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6315P. The Xeon 6315P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2648L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6315P scores 11,721 against the Xeon E5-2648L v4's 11,839 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2648L v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6315P vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2648L v4.
| Feature | Xeon 6315P | Xeon E5-2648L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 14 / 28+250% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+150% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 35 MB+192% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3.5 MB+180% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 11,721 | 11,839+1% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon 6315P and Xeon E5-2648L v4
