Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2650 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2650 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2650 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6315P

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 55W instead of 105W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2650 v3 across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,166 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2650 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2650 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.6% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,662 vs 11,721).
❌90.9% higher power demand at 105W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Xeon 6315P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6315P better than Xeon E5-2650 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2650 v3 is ahead with a 26.6% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6315P pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2650 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6315P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6315P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6315P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,166 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2650 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 26.6% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6315P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2014), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 10/20. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2650 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6315P

The Xeon 6315P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 11,721 points. Launch price was $213.

Xeon E5-2650 v3

The Xeon E5-2650 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,662 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6315P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon 6315P versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v3 — a 40% clock advantage for the Xeon 6315P (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon 6315P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6315P scores 11,721 against the Xeon E5-2650 v3's 11,662 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon 6315P. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6315P vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v3.

Feature	Xeon 6315P	Xeon E5-2650 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	10 / 20+150%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+50%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+22%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+108%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	11,721	11,662

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6315P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2650 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon 6315P	Xeon E5-2650 v3
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40