Core i7-11375H vs Xeon 6315P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11375H vs Xeon 6315P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11375H vs Xeon 6315P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11375H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 55W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Xeon 6315P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Xeon 6315P

2025

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11375H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,721 vs 11,732).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,166 MSRP, while Core i7-11375H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌96.4% higher power demand at 55W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-11375H better than Xeon 6315P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6315P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-11375H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-11375H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 31.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-11375H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-11375H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 6315P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-11375H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,166 MSRP, and it still gives you a 31.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 6315P is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6315P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1449. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-11375H vs Xeon 6315P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11375H

The Core i7-11375H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,732 points. Launch price was $482.

Xeon 6315P

The Xeon 6315P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 11,721 points. Launch price was $213.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-11375H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon 6315P's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-11375H versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon 6315P — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-11375H (base: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-11375H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon 6315P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11375H scores 11,732 against the Xeon 6315P's 11,721 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-11375H. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-11375H	Xeon 6315P
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	5 GHz+11%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+7%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	11,732	11,721

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11375H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6315P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.