Core i7-11375H vs Xeon E-2276M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11375H vs Xeon E-2276M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11375H vs Xeon E-2276M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11375H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2276M, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon E-2276M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11375H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,654 vs 11,732).
❌Launch MSRP is still $939 MSRP, while Core i7-11375H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-11375H better than Xeon E-2276M?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2276M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-11375H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-11375H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-11375H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-11375H is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-11375H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $939 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E-2276M only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 12.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-11375H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-11375H vs Xeon E-2276M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11375H

The Core i7-11375H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,732 points. Launch price was $482.

Xeon E-2276M

The Xeon E-2276M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,654 points. Launch price was $450.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-11375H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2276M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E-2276M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-11375H versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon E-2276M — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-11375H (base: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-11375H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E-2276M uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11375H scores 11,732 against the Xeon E-2276M's 11,654 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-11375H. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-11375H	Xeon E-2276M
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+6%	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+7%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
PassMark	11,732	11,654

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11375H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2276M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.