Core i7-11375H vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

Core i7-11375H vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-11375H

6 / 8

11,732

0.0%

11,875

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11375H vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11375H vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11375H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,732 vs 11,875).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11375H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $219 MSRP, while Core i7-11375H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-11375H better than Ryzen 5 PRO 1600?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-11375H is ahead with a 16.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-11375H is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-11375H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $219 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (54.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-11375H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-11375H vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11375H

The Core i7-11375H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,732 points. Launch price was $482.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 11,875 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-11375H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-11375H versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-11375H (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-11375H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11375H scores 11,732 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 11,875 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-11375H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600.

Feature	Core i7-11375H	Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+39%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.2 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	11,732	11,875+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11375H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.