Core i7-11375H vs Ryzen 3 3100

Intel

Core i7-11375H

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 5 GHz2021
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 3100

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020
Ryzen family
·······

Core i7-11375H vs Ryzen 3 3100 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11375H vs Ryzen 3 3100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11375H vs Ryzen 3 3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11375H

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (11,732 vs 11,928).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 3 3100

2020

Why buy it

  • +1.7% higher PassMark.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11375H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core i7-11375H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-11375H better than Ryzen 3 3100?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-11375H is ahead with a 13.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 3100 pulls ahead with 1.7% better PassMark. Ryzen 3 3100 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 3100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-11375H is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-11375H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 3100 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 11,928 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-11375H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-11375H vs Ryzen 3 3100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-11375H

The Core i7-11375H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,732 points. Launch price was $482.

AMD

Ryzen 3 3100

The Ryzen 3 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,928 points. Launch price was $99.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-11375H and Ryzen 3 3100 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-11375H versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3100 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-11375H (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-11375H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 3 3100 uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11375H scores 11,732 against the Ryzen 3 3100's 11,928 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen 3 3100. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-11375H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3100.

FeatureCore i7-11375HRyzen 3 3100
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
5 GHz+28%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+40860%
Process
10 nm SuperFin
7 nm-30%
Architecture
Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
11,732
11,928+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11375H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 3 3100 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-11375HRyzen 3 3100
Socket
FCBGA1449
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-11375H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 3100). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 3100 targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-11375HRyzen 3 3100
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop