Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E-2276M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E-2276M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E-2276M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6315P

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2276M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($1,166 MSRP vs $939 MSRP).
❌22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.

Xeon E-2276M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $227 less on MSRP ($939 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($939 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,654 vs 11,721).
❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Xeon 6315P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2276M better than Xeon 6315P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E-2276M is ahead with a 16.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6315P pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6315P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2276M is the better buy right now. Xeon E-2276M comes in $227 cheaper on MSRP at $939 MSRP versus $1,166 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon 6315P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 23.5% better value on MSRP (12.4 vs 10.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6315P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E-2276M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6315P

The Xeon 6315P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 11,721 points. Launch price was $213.

Xeon E-2276M

The Xeon E-2276M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,654 points. Launch price was $450.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6315P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E-2276M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E-2276M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon 6315P versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon E-2276M — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2276M (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon 6315P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E-2276M uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6315P scores 11,721 against the Xeon E-2276M's 11,654 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon 6315P. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon 6315P	Xeon E-2276M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	4.7 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
PassMark	11,721	11,654

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6315P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2276M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon 6315P	Xeon E-2276M
Socket	LGA1700	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6315P was priced at $1166, while the Xeon E-2276M came in at $939. On launch pricing ($1166 vs $939), Xeon E-2276M was $227 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6315P delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 12.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2276M — making the Xeon E-2276M the 21% better value option.

Feature	Xeon 6315P	Xeon E-2276M
MSRP	$1166	$939-19%
Performance per Dollar	10.1	12.4+23%
Release Date	2025	2019

Search Xeon 6315P on Amazon

Search Xeon E-2276M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.