
Xeon 6315P

Xeon E5-2650L v3
Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2650L v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2650L v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2650L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon 6315P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $163 less on MSRP ($1,166 MSRP vs $1,329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.1 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($1,166 MSRP vs $1,329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2650L v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,721 vs 11,865).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
Xeon E5-2650L v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($1,329 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Xeon 6315P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2650L v3 better than Xeon 6315P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6315P vs Xeon E5-2650L v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6315P
The Xeon 6315P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 11,721 points. Launch price was $213.

Xeon E5-2650L v3
The Xeon E5-2650L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,865 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6315P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650L v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon 6315P versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L v3 — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Xeon 6315P (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon 6315P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650L v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6315P scores 11,721 against the Xeon E5-2650L v3's 11,865 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2650L v3. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6315P vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650L v3.
| Feature | Xeon 6315P | Xeon E5-2650L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 12 / 24+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+80% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+56% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 11,721 | 11,865+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6315P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2650L v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon 6315P | Xeon E5-2650L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon 6315P) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650L v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650L v3 targets Server Low Power.
| Feature | Xeon 6315P | Xeon E5-2650L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server Low Power |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon 6315P was priced at $1166, while the Xeon E5-2650L v3 came in at $1329. On launch pricing ($1166 vs $1329), Xeon 6315P was $163 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6315P delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2650L v3 — making the Xeon 6315P the 11.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6315P | Xeon E5-2650L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1166-12% | $1329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.1+13% | 8.9 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














