Xeon 6315P vs Xeon Platinum 8481C

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6315P vs Xeon Platinum 8481C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6315P vs Xeon Platinum 8481C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6315P

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 55W instead of 350W, a 295W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8481C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,166 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8481C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Platinum 8481C

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,681 vs 11,721).
❌536.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6315P better than Xeon Platinum 8481C?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8481C is ahead with a 27.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6315P pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8481C also has the bigger cache pool with 775% larger total L3 cache (105 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6315P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6315P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6315P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,166 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8481C is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 27.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6315P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 56/112. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon 6315P vs Xeon Platinum 8481C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6315P

The Xeon 6315P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 11,721 points. Launch price was $213.

Xeon Platinum 8481C

The Xeon Platinum 8481C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,681 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6315P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8481C offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8481C has 52 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon 6315P versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8481C — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Xeon 6315P (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon 6315P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8481C uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6315P scores 11,721 against the Xeon Platinum 8481C's 11,681 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon 6315P. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6315P vs 105 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8481C.

Feature	Xeon 6315P	Xeon Platinum 8481C
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	56 / 112+1300%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+18%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	105 MB+775%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	11,721	11,681

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6315P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8481C uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.