Xeon E5-2650 v3
VS
Ryzen Embedded V3C14

Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Ryzen Embedded V3C14

Intel

Xeon E5-2650 v3

10 Cores20 Thrd105 WWMax: 3 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V3C14

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2650 v3 is positioned at rank #297 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4455%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
841%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
747%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
577%
#230
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $368
100%
#232
EPYC 7282
MSRP: $650|Avg: $199
100%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
98%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
98%
#297
Xeon E5-2650 v3
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#304
Xeon E5-2620 v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $410
99%
#306
Xeon Silver 4108
MSRP: $417|Avg: $46
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V3C14

#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
115%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
115%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
114%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
114%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
114%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
113%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
113%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
112%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
111%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
111%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
110%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
110%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
106%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
106%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
100%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
100%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
99%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
95%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
91%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
89%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
88%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
85%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
84%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
83%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
78%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
73%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
72%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
72%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
71%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded V3C14 (2022) utilizes 6 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2650 v3Ryzen Embedded V3C14
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($305)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Rembrandt (2022) / 6 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2650 v3 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2650 v3Ryzen Embedded V3C14
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($305)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Ryzen Embedded V3C14

Intel

Xeon E5-2650 v3

The Xeon E5-2650 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,662 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V3C14

The Ryzen Embedded V3C14 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,882 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2650 v3 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v3 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2650 v3 scores 11,662 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C14's 11,882 — a 1.9% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V3C14. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C14.

FeatureXeon E5-2650 v3Ryzen Embedded V3C14
Cores / Threads
10 / 20+150%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
25 MB (total)+213%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm
6 nm-73%
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Rembrandt (2022)
PassMark
11,662
11,882+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2650 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2650 v3Ryzen Embedded V3C14
Socket
LGA2011
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40