Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Core i7-11370H
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Core i7-11370H
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2650 v3 is positioned at rank 297 and the Core i7-11370H is on rank 757, so the Xeon E5-2650 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650 v3
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-11370H
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2650 v3 | Core i7-11370H |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($426) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) / 10 nm SuperFin) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2650 v3 | Core i7-11370H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($426) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-11370H
Xeon E5-2650 v3
The Xeon E5-2650 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,662 points. Launch price was $800.
Core i7-11370H
The Core i7-11370H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,548 points. Launch price was $426.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2650 v3 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-11370H offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v3 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11370H — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-11370H (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-11370H uses Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2650 v3 scores 11,662 against the Core i7-11370H's 11,548 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2650 v3. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-11370H.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650 v3 | Core i7-11370H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.8 GHz+60% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3 GHz+30% |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+108% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 22 nm | 10 nm SuperFin-55% |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) |
| PassMark | 11,662 | 11,548 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 5,563 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,612 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2650 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-11370H uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2133 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2650 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2650 v3) vs 2 (Core i7-11370H). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2650 v3) vs 20 (Core i7-11370H) — the Xeon E5-2650 v3 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2650 v3) and SoC (Core i7-11370H).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650 v3 | Core i7-11370H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | FCBGA1449 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB+1100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40+100% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2650 v3) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11370H). The Core i7-11370H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Xeon E5-2650 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11370H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-11370H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650 v3 | Core i7-11370H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-11370H
