
Xeon E5-2667 vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

Xeon E5-2667

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2667 is positioned at rank #991 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2667
Performance Per Dollar Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2667 | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($31) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2667 | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+382%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($31) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2667 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

Xeon E5-2667
The Xeon E5-2667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,442 points. Launch price was $714.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2667 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 versus 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E5-2667 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2667 scores 7,442 against the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 7,468 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667 vs 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2667 | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 15360 kB (total)+275% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 12 nm-63% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 7,442 | 7,468 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2667 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3 1600 MHz on the Xeon E5-2667 versus DDR4-2933 on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G — the Xeon E5-2667 supports 199.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2667 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2667) vs 2 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2667) vs 8 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) — the Xeon E5-2667 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel C602,Intel X79 (Xeon E5-2667) and AMD AM4 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2667 | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3 1600 MHz | DDR4-2933+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 384 GB+500% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40+400% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Xeon E5-2667) / not specified (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E5-2667 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2667 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2667 | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Vega 3 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2667 launched at $1552 MSRP, while the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G debuted at $150. At current prices ($31 vs $150), the Xeon E5-2667 is $119 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2667 delivers 240.1 pts/$ vs 49.8 pts/$ for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G — making the Xeon E5-2667 the 131.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2667 | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1552 | $150-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $31-79% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 240.1+382% | 49.8 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















