Xeon E5-2667 vs Xeon E5-1630 v3
Xeon E5-2667
Xeon E5-1630 v3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2667 is positioned at rank 991 and the Xeon E5-1630 v3 is on rank 402, so the Xeon E5-1630 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2667
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1630 v3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2667 | Xeon E5-1630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($31) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($299) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2667 | Xeon E5-1630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+867%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($31) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($299) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2667 and Xeon E5-1630 v3
Xeon E5-2667
The Xeon E5-2667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,442 points. Launch price was $714.
Xeon E5-1630 v3
The Xeon E5-1630 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 7,421 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2667 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-1630 v3 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1630 v3 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1630 v3 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Xeon E5-2667 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-1630 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2667 scores 7,442 against the Xeon E5-1630 v3's 7,421 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2667. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1630 v3.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2667 | Xeon E5-1630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 15360 kB (total)+50% | 10 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 7,442 | 7,421 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 2.0.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2667 | Xeon E5-1630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3 1600 MHz | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 384 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Xeon E5-2667) / not specified (Xeon E5-1630 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2667 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2667 | Xeon E5-1630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2667 launched at $1552 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-1630 v3 debuted at $372. At current prices ($31 vs $299), the Xeon E5-2667 is $268 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2667 delivers 240.1 pts/$ vs 24.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1630 v3 — making the Xeon E5-2667 the 162.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2667 | Xeon E5-1630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1552 | $372-76% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $31-90% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 240.1+868% | 24.8 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2667 and Xeon E5-1630 v3
