Xeon E5-2680 v2
VS
Core i7-8700

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i7-8700

Intel

Xeon E5-2680 v2

10 Cores20 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i7-8700

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2680 v2 is positioned at rank 636 and the Core i7-8700 is on rank 483, so the Core i7-8700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2680 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
10909%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2060%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1830%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1414%
#380
Xeon Gold 6526Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
100%
#382
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP: $3995|Avg: N/A
98%
#383
EPYC 7551P
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $329
95%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
MSRP: $7349|Avg: $7999
95%
#385
EPYC 9375F
MSRP: $5306|Avg: $108
95%
#636
Xeon E5-2680 v2
MSRP: $667|Avg: $462
100%
#640
Xeon W-2104
MSRP: $294|Avg: $309
99%
#643
Xeon E5-2620 v3
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
97%
#650
Xeon E3-1275L v3
MSRP: $350|Avg: $29
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-8700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7409%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7001%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5083%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1531%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1213%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1061%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
608%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
600%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
546%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
546%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
540%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
525%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
518%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
516%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
511%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
99%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
99%
#483
Core i7-8700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $110
100%
#487
Pentium Dual-Core E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
99%
#491
Pentium G4600T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $35
97%
#493
Core i5-6500T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $35
97%
#494
FX-6330
MSRP: $109|Avg: $25
97%
#495
Celeron G1630
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-8700 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2680 v2Core i7-8700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($462)
More affordable ($110)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2680 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2680 v2Core i7-8700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+321%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($462)
More affordable ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Core i7-8700

Intel

Xeon E5-2680 v2

The Xeon E5-2680 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,707 points. Launch price was $1,260.

Intel

Core i7-8700

The Core i7-8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $303.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2680 v2 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-8700 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v2 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-8700 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-8700 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2680 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-8700 uses Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2680 v2 scores 12,707 against the Core i7-8700's 12,747 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-8700. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs 12288 kB on the Core i7-8700.

FeatureXeon E5-2680 v2Core i7-8700
Cores / Threads
10 / 20+67%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz+28%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
25 MB (total)+108%
12288 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018)
PassMark
12,707
12,747
Cinebench R23 Multi
7,969
Geekbench 6 Single
1,535
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2680 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-8700 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2680 v2 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-8700 — the Core i7-8700 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2680 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2680 v2) vs 2 (Core i7-8700). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2680 v2) vs 16 (Core i7-8700) — the Xeon E5-2680 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2680 v2) and 300-series (Core i7-8700).

FeatureXeon E5-2680 v2Core i7-8700
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2666+33%
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB+500%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40+150%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2680 v2) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-8700). The Core i7-8700 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2680 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-8700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-8700 rivals Ryzen 5 2600.

FeatureXeon E5-2680 v2Core i7-8700
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-2680 v2 launched at $667 MSRP, while the Core i7-8700 debuted at $303. At current prices ($462 vs $110), the Core i7-8700 is $352 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2680 v2 delivers 27.5 pts/$ vs 115.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-8700 — making the Core i7-8700 the 123.3% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-2680 v2Core i7-8700
MSRP
$667
$303-55%
Avg Price (30d)
$462
$110-76%
Performance per Dollar
27.5
115.9+321%
Release Date
2013
2017