Xeon E5-2698 v3
VS
Ryzen 9 4900HS

Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Ryzen 9 4900HS

Intel

Xeon E5-2698 v3

16 Cores32 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 4900HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2698 v3

#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
102%
#90
Xeon E5-2698 v3
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
98%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
97%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 4900HS

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
101%
#146
Ryzen 9 4900HS
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
97%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
95%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 9 4900HS (2020) utilizes 7 nm technology and DDR4-4266, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2698 v3Ryzen 9 4900HS
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2698 v3 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2698 v3Ryzen 9 4900HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2698 v3 and Ryzen 9 4900HS

Intel

Xeon E5-2698 v3

The Xeon E5-2698 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 18,870 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Ryzen 9 4900HS

The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2698 v3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 4900HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2698 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698 v3 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS — a 17.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 4900HS (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2698 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2698 v3 scores 18,870 against the Ryzen 9 4900HS's 18,793 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2698 v3. L3 cache: 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS.

FeatureXeon E5-2698 v3Ryzen 9 4900HS
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz+19%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
40 MB (total)+400%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm
7 nm-68%
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Renoir (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark
18,870
18,793
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2698 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2698 v3Ryzen 9 4900HS
Socket
LGA2011
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-4266
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2698 v3) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 4900HS). The Ryzen 9 4900HS includes integrated graphics (Vega 8), while the Xeon E5-2698 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End.

FeatureXeon E5-2698 v3Ryzen 9 4900HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Vega 8
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile High-End