Xeon E5-2699 v4 vs Xeon Gold 5220

Intel

Xeon E5-2699 v4

22 Cores44 Thrd145 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 5220

18 Cores36 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon E5-2699 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +122.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 25 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $4,115 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 16% higher power demand at 145W vs 125W.

Xeon Gold 5220

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 125W instead of 145W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2699 v4 across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (24,480 vs 24,711).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 55 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2699 v4 better than Xeon Gold 5220?
Yes. Xeon E5-2699 v4 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 11.7% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2699 v4 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 11.7% more average FPS across 40 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2699 v4 is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 122.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 25 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-2699 v4 is the smarter buy today. Xeon E5-2699 v4 is at an unclear MSRP at $4,115 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5220 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon E5-2699 v4Xeon Gold 5220
1080p
low187 FPS182 FPS
medium164 FPS147 FPS
high131 FPS120 FPS
ultra104 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low154 FPS144 FPS
medium130 FPS114 FPS
high100 FPS92 FPS
ultra81 FPS72 FPS
4K
low70 FPS67 FPS
medium62 FPS56 FPS
high48 FPS45 FPS
ultra39 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon E5-2699 v4Xeon Gold 5220
1080p
low211 FPS211 FPS
medium192 FPS186 FPS
high164 FPS161 FPS
ultra132 FPS136 FPS
1440p
low182 FPS182 FPS
medium165 FPS165 FPS
high143 FPS143 FPS
ultra112 FPS120 FPS
4K
low115 FPS118 FPS
medium105 FPS108 FPS
high93 FPS99 FPS
ultra74 FPS82 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon E5-2699 v4Xeon Gold 5220
1080p
low618 FPS612 FPS
medium618 FPS612 FPS
high618 FPS612 FPS
ultra618 FPS612 FPS
1440p
low618 FPS612 FPS
medium618 FPS605 FPS
high590 FPS573 FPS
ultra532 FPS506 FPS
4K
low469 FPS455 FPS
medium382 FPS357 FPS
high347 FPS318 FPS
ultra289 FPS259 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon E5-2699 v4Xeon Gold 5220
1080p
low618 FPS612 FPS
medium618 FPS612 FPS
high618 FPS612 FPS
ultra614 FPS563 FPS
1440p
low618 FPS612 FPS
medium618 FPS587 FPS
high572 FPS505 FPS
ultra484 FPS433 FPS
4K
low551 FPS462 FPS
medium493 FPS414 FPS
high436 FPS369 FPS
ultra373 FPS320 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Xeon Gold 5220

Intel

Xeon E5-2699 v4

The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,711 points. Launch price was $4,115.

Intel

Xeon Gold 5220

The Xeon Gold 5220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 24,480 points. Launch price was $1,555.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2699 v4 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5220 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5220 — a 8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5220 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5220 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2699 v4 scores 24,711 against the Xeon Gold 5220's 24,480 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2699 v4. L3 cache: 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5220.

FeatureXeon E5-2699 v4Xeon Gold 5220
Cores / Threads
22 / 44+22%
18 / 36
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
55 MB+122%
24.75 MB
L2 Cache
5.5 MB
18 MB+227%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
24,711
24,480
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5220 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2699 v4Xeon Gold 5220
Socket
LGA2011
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2400
Max RAM Capacity
1536
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v4) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5220). Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2699 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.

FeatureXeon E5-2699 v4Xeon Gold 5220
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d