
Xeon E5-2699 v4
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E5-2699 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+122.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $4,115 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌16% higher power demand at 145W vs 125W.
Xeon Gold 5220
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 145W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2699 v4 across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,480 vs 24,711).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 55 MB).
Xeon E5-2699 v4
2016Xeon Gold 5220
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+122.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 145W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $4,115 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌16% higher power demand at 145W vs 125W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2699 v4 across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,480 vs 24,711).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 55 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2699 v4 better than Xeon Gold 5220?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2699 v4 | Xeon Gold 5220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2699 v4 | Xeon Gold 5220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E5-2699 v4 | Xeon Gold 5220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 612 FPS |
| ultra | 618 FPS | 612 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 532 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E5-2699 v4 | Xeon Gold 5220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 612 FPS |
| ultra | 614 FPS | 563 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Xeon Gold 5220

Xeon E5-2699 v4
Xeon E5-2699 v4
The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,711 points. Launch price was $4,115.

Xeon Gold 5220
Xeon Gold 5220
The Xeon Gold 5220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 24,480 points. Launch price was $1,555.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2699 v4 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5220 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5220 — a 8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5220 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5220 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2699 v4 scores 24,711 against the Xeon Gold 5220's 24,480 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2699 v4. L3 cache: 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5220.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2699 v4 | Xeon Gold 5220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 22 / 44+22% | 18 / 36 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 55 MB+122% | 24.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 18 MB+227% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,711 | 24,480 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5220 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2699 v4 | Xeon Gold 5220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v4) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5220). Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2699 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2699 v4 | Xeon Gold 5220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













