Core i7-13705H vs Xeon E5-2699 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13705H vs Xeon E5-2699 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13705H vs Xeon E5-2699 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13705H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 145W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2699 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+129.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13705H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,711 vs 24,905).
❌Launch MSRP is still $4,115 MSRP, while Core i7-13705H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌222.2% higher power demand at 145W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i7-13705H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13705H better than Xeon E5-2699 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2699 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13705H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13705H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13705H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13705H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2699 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-13705H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $4,115 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2699 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13705H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FCBGA1792 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 22/44. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13705H vs Xeon E5-2699 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13705H

The Core i7-13705H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,905 points. Launch price was $502.

Xeon E5-2699 v4

The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,711 points. Launch price was $4,115.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13705H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13705H versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-13705H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-13705H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13705H scores 24,905 against the Xeon E5-2699 v4's 24,711 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-13705H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13705H vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2699 v4.

Feature	Core i7-13705H	Xeon E5-2699 v4
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	22 / 44+57%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+39%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+9%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	55 MB+129%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	5.5 MB+175%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	24,905	24,711

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13705H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13705H	Xeon E5-2699 v4
Socket	FCBGA1792	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-13705H) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v4). Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2699 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.